When disco music fell out of favour at the dawn of the 1980s, jazz prodigy Patrice Rushen became pivotal in ushering in a new era of post-disco and boogie — offshoots of the cast out genre that James Mtume, Reggie Lucas and Kashif also had a hand in moulding.
Under Elektra Records, Patrice would release a string of albums that pushed R&B forward without sacrificing its roots. Floor-fillers like ‘Hang It Up’, ‘Haven’t You Heard’, ‘Never Gonna Give You Up (Won't Let You Be)’, ‘Feels So Real (Won't Let Go)’ and ‘Get Off (You Fascinate Me)’ were demonstrations of a new sound that synthesised all of Black music's past and ultimately prophesied its future. Patrice characterised the sound as “sophisticated dance music”.
In 1982, Patrice was vaulted into eternal pop music ubiquity with the release of her seventh album ‘Straight From The Heart’. Best known for featuring her signature song ‘Forget Me Nots’, which would be famously sampled on Will Smith’s ‘Men In Black’ and George Michael’s ‘Fastlove’, the seminal body of work was also home to the timeless cult classics ‘Remind Me’, ‘Number One’ and ‘Where There Is Love’. Forward-thinking in its approach, ‘Straight From The Heart’ saw Patrice at the height of her powers as a pop music provocateur.
Read this next: Eight emerging artists who are changing the sound of soul
Patrice Rushen’s under-discussed influence on contemporary pop culture can be traced through the many future classics she influenced. Her material continues to be a never-ending reservoir for those partial to sampling. Kirk Franklin, Mary J. Blige, Mobb Deep, Zhane, Shabba Ranks, De La Soul, Musiq Soulchild and Ty Dolla $ign are just few of the artists who’ve turned to Patrice’s work as a North Star. When listening to her back catalogue, it's striking how audible the foundations for the development of neo-soul, smooth jazz, quiet storm, dance-pop and house music are within her music.
Shifting tastes and creative differences with labels would eventually cause Patrice to step away from life as a front-facing artist. Her esteemed pedigree as an accomplished multi-instrumentalist and arranger meant she stayed a powerful force behind the scenes, including making history as the first woman to work on The GRAMMYs and The Emmys as a musical director. Patrice has since expanded into the world of academia, serving as an ambassador for artistry in education at the Berklee College of Music and teaching at the USC Thornton School of Music, where she is chair of their popular music program.
This year marks the 40th anniversary of your landmark album ‘Straight From The Heart’. What are your memories of that time?
Nothing but happy memories. I always had such a great time in the studio with my friends. We weren’t going for hits per se or thinking about formulas, we were just doing the music we liked to do. It was a little different for its time. Slightly ahead of the curve in terms of what was on the radio back then.
’Forget Me Nots’ was met with nothing but disdain by the record company. They said, “We don't get it. We don't hear any hits on this album. Nothing”. Yet that's the album that has ‘Remind Me’, ‘Number One’ and of course ‘Forget Me Nots’. All of which are among my most recognisable songs.
For us it was a positive reaction, because if we really believed in it, then we would have to show that we were willing to stand by it. We can't make people love it, but it needed to get in front of them for them to be able to decide. Black radio at the time was a particularly big deciding factor for Black artists. I was always looking at it like “What do my people think first?” — making sure that the material got to radio and that the people who listened could weigh in on what they were hearing.
We put our money in, and it blew up to the point that the label gave back the money we spent on independent radio promotion. That album and that song in particular has really special meaning because here we are 40 years later, and it is still being used, sampled and danced to everywhere. Now even on TikTok!
Tell me about the creative process behind ‘Number One’, and '(She Will) Take You Down To Love’?
When I was getting ready to start writing that album, ‘Number One’ was the first thing that I wrote. I wanted to show that there could be this melding of groove that was danceable and infectious, but still have harmony with nice changes and progressions. A great arrangement that kept people interested but had improvisation, which was part of my jazz roots. I didn't feel like any of those things were mutually exclusive. We called it ‘Number One’ so we could move on and the name just stuck.
With ‘(She Will) Take You Down to Love’, I had a real fascination for the music of South America - particularly Brazil. I just was playing around on the guitar, and found this feel that I thought was cool. I had become friends with the actress Fay Hauser-Pryce who was in the movie Roots. She was a real lover of music, so I asked her to take a stab at writing some lyrics and she came back with what you hear. I wanted it to feel intimate, provocative and have that simmering soulfulness. It's just myself on guitar and Paulinho da Costa on percussion.
Read this next: 10 of the most influential disco labels of the last decade
What was the landscape of Black music in 1982 when the album initially came out?
I think there was a love affair with trying to crossover. The idea of crossing over became a big deal at that time. For some it was a preoccupation and almost an obsession. It was the whole trickle down theory. Theoretically, if you sell more records and get more airplay then you can tour to a wider audience.
There isn’t anything necessarily wrong with that, but people would then alter who they were in order to be more palatable to pop radio. Even if it wasn’t a good fit for what they’re about or what they represented musically. Certain artists were able to do that and become more popular, whereas others diminished and dissolved a lot of their uniqueness trying to be something else.
I however, was not worried about that. That came with some good and also some bad. The good news is that when I went into the studio, we went in to do what we loved to do and what we wanted to do. The bad news is that if it didn't fall into a neat lane, it could be perceived as being too jazzy to be R&B, too Black to be pop or too pop to be Black. I was just trying to do the music that I liked, and as far as I was concerned, it could go to whoever wanted it. To record companies, that would have looked like I wasn’t trying to move up the crossover food chain.
Throughout the '80s, a lot of music was criticised as there was thought to be too much reliance on synthesisers and the other new technology. The brilliance of your work is that it struck a sweet balance of organic musicianship while embracing the technology. How did you keep that balance?
When synthesisers started becoming more accessible and easier to program, it opened up a completely different palette of colours that could be applied to whatever kind of music that you wanted to do. It was like I had 100 extra colours in my crayon box, that's the way I viewed it. I had more to experiment with. Having new ways in which to express, expand and animate the musical experience of creating but also listening.
I embrace technology and new instruments because it helps you do things faster and with more accuracy. It also provides more elegance and greater articulation because you can do just about anything. Conversely, just because you can do anything, it’s no excuse to not get it right in the first place. If that's what you mean to do, get it right! That way, your announcement of that particular thing truly represents what it was you were intending to do.
Raed this next: When signing to a major label goes very, very wrong
You were given a lot of creative control at Elektra Records but the label seemed to always approach your music with trepidation and hesitation when it came to promotion. Did your time at Elektra and eventually with Clive Davis at Arista Records kill your love of making albums and being a front-facing artist?
No, not at all. The public had already given me the highest compliment of all. They were embracing the music without the kind of hyperbole that typically would have to accompany a new release. That said enough to me. That's what a songwriter or composer wants, acknowledgement that the music that they're doing is reaching people. And if that can be done organically like it often was, I didn't take it lightly.
Then it got to a place where it became a contest. The brass ring of more record sales. I was being told if you want to sell more records, here’s what you're going to have to do. The brakes were put on me being left to my own devices with the confidence that I could come up with a hit on my own. That was my experience at Arista. It was a different company with a different mentality.
Clive Davis was very hands on about what he wanted to see done. He appreciated great talent but he was controlling about the way things would go down. By this point, I had already been nominated for GRAMMYs, seen a lot and more importantly amassed ample respect. I didn't feel like what he wanted was for me. My philosophical approach when it came to music meant that it didn't mean that much to me to sell loads of records. I don't put down people who go down that path, because I know how hard they work. I just didn't want to do it.
I told him that I was never really going to be what he wanted me to be, and he didn’t want to support what I wanted to do. After my ‘Watch Out’ album, he let me out of the contract. I then went back to what I was trying to do in the first place, which was film scoring. Everything I had done was a route to making that dream happen. I was able to score the cult film, Hollywood Shuffle for Robert Townsend. From there, I was able to work as a music director for the NAACP Image Awards, the Emmys, and eventually the GRAMMYs. I feel it turned a corner on the recording side of things, so for a long time, I just didn't do it.
In broader pop culture, your name is often referenced to the many times artists have sampled your music. What is your opinion on sampling today? There’s been a discussion that the art form of sampling isn’t as imaginative as its used to be.
When it first was happening, I was actually very interested in the kind of manipulation that they would do. It was very creative; they would do really interesting things with the beats and the original phrases they would take from. But in the recent past, people are just lifting whole chunks from past songs and putting a new lyric on top of the same melody — taking something that could have just been played, lifting it from one record and sandwiching it on top of another one.
I'm not saying that sampling is bad, but I do think people are leaning into it in a way that is not necessarily healthy for the idea and proposition of craft. It bothers me a little bit because it sends a very bad message. Where are we with the creative aspects that allow for you to build on that idea and do something else with it? I certainly don't mind the idea of a sample. I do mind when it is in place of skill, when it is in place of a homage to something where you can take one moment and build another bespoke moment of its own from it.
Read this next: 20 of the best house music samples
NxWorries (Knxwledge and Anderson .Paak) sampled your song ‘To Each His Own’ for ‘Droogs’. I think that’s a solid example of maintaining the essence of the original but making it fresh for a new generation.
Well, that's what I mean, there's so many positives that come out of somebody hearing something and building on the original idea. That way, you have this idea of lineage and tradition, where there's a connectivity to our music. There's got to be that because it didn't all start yesterday. Nowadays, we’re skipping the idea of something coming from somewhere else. We just want to get right to it. We think we're innovating something and we're not.
Innovation has a couple of steps before it. Step one is imitation. You learn how to do everything by imitating somebody who does it right. The next step is assimilation. You take the idea, and you begin to master the essence of what it is. Then there's innovation. How are you going to take what you have mastered through imitation and assimilation, and do something with it, that allows for that cycle to start again at another level. These days we want to get right to the innovation part without the work and that isn’t going to happen.
What are your thoughts on the resurgence of disco, post-disco and funk by way of acts like Jessie Ware, The Weeknd, Lizzo, Dua Lipa and Harry Styles? And arguably getting more commercial recognition than you and some of your contemporaries did.
As a college professor who teaches popular music, one of the things that becomes really obvious is that those in higher education are there because they are wanting to go deeper. They want to do a deep dive into massive amounts of musical material. They want to be able to use that as a launchpad for whatever they're going to do. They want to understand where it all comes from.
I think that the artists that you’ve mentioned maybe haven't done the deep dive, but they've gone back far enough to realise the validity and the value of those sounds and grooves. It sticks in a different way, when people can see that you're not out here winging it. That you've taken the time to be able to get with your team and think about how it's going to be presented. I think that's why some of those artists stand out.
Read this next: 10 early-80s post-disco tracks that helped inspire house
I'm okay with the idea that artists like myself didn't get our just due. A lot of us were rewarded in ways that allowed for us to continue to do it. That's why we did it. You could tell who was doing it because they loved it. It was a part of who they were, it resonated with their truth. Their truth was so powerful that it resonated with another person's truth.
We were hybrids that came from a generation that gave us permission to go for whatever we wanted musically, as long as it was presented at a high level. Creating an environment that told us it's okay to do our thing because we were already standing on the shoulders of those who have done it. So, when you talk about the artists you mentioned, those are people who are standing on ours. And that's the way it's supposed to go.
Alongside George Duke, Grover Washington Jr, Donald Byrd and Herbie Hancock, you formed a class of traditional jazz musicians who incorporated other genres into the medium like funk, disco, R&B and hip hop. What are your thoughts on the likes of Robert Glasper, Terrace Martin, Kamasi Washington, Ezparenza Spalding and Thundercat who are following in all your footsteps?
I think what they're doing is really cool and interesting. Jazz is supposed to be a progressive music. It is supposed to allow for new ways to manipulate the musical language and elevate the landscape. I knew Thundercat as a kid and he’s done a great job. I remember Thundercat when he was Steven.
Wow! How so?
I went to high school with his dad. Thundercat’s dad is an amazing drummer. I went to high school with Kamasi Washington’s dad too. I remember when they were born. I know that they were in a household environment that offered them a viewpoint as to what excellent musicianship looks like.
The music industry has evolved tremendously since you debuted. Artists today are able to take their careers into their own hands with more freedom and autonomy. With all these changes, do you ever plan to record together another album?
Yes, things have changed a lot. I grew up in the music business of a completely different paradigm, so I had to wait for things to settle down. I think things have now settled into a place where I feel like it's safe. Recording was not a safe haven for me after my experiences with Elektra and Arista. It wasn’t totally bad, as it allowed me to see more clearly what was most important to me, but it really forced me to take a step back for a long time. It was okay for me not to be recording, because the idea was music making and I was always doing that. I never stopped working.
Now though? I can see the path. I can see a pathway that allows for me to be able to maintain the autonomy that I had always had, but be able to do it more freely. I don't have to be worried about what somebody's going to say. I can just do the music that I would really like to do, because I already know it will resonate with somebody if I’m doing it out of the love for it.
So yes! There is an album in the future. I'm trying to write as much as I can this summer. I’m also trying to play more and be in front of my audience again. The inspiration that comes from doing shows is huge. That's what's going to inspire the next project.
Beyond the music, you’re also known for your beaded braids which became one of the most iconic black hairstyles of the '70s and '80s. What is the story behind them?
I was looking for a way to separate myself from everybody else that was out. I’m very proud of my heritage and I wanted to be able to celebrate that with my imagery. I was talking to my friend Sibongile Bradley about what my look could be, and she showed me these books of African princesses and kings. Obviously, I’d seen braids and plaits my whole life, but these were adorned with jewellery, beads and shells. She suggested that I do something similar and once I started doing it, it immediately felt right for me.
It definitely allowed me to stick out and without having to say it, said how I feel about my people. It offered an opportunity to be in that celebratory mode all the time. Offering not only the music, but the possibilities because of how it was packaged. Carrying forth a tradition as Black people that has to do with our crown. And our crown is our hair.
Patrice Rushen's music is on sale via Strut Records
Sope Soetan is a freelance music journalist, podcaster and researcher, follow him on Twitter